Selasa, 16 Juni 2009
I am not jobless clarifying rumors’ Nayanthara
I have not kissed Bharath” says Thamanna

Thamanna is now quite busy after acting with Surya in Ayan. There is a stiff competition between the top actors to pair with her. She is in high demand now. Now she is acting with Bharath in the film Kandein Kadhalai. There was news recently about Thamanna relaxing her norms and has agreed to do the kissing scene in Kandein Kadhalai. When Thamanna was asked about this, she said,” The climax scene was shot two days ago. News was spread that I have acted in kissing scene with Bharath in the climax sequence. I have not acted like that. The whole film was shot as in the original film.
Director Kannan told me the whole story before signing the agreement. This film is a remake of the Hindi film Jab We Met. In this film there is a kissing scene. So I told the director that I would be happy if this scene is deleted in the Tamil version. He has also agreed and confirmed me that there will be no kissing scene in this film. Hence there is no confusion about this. There is no such scene in this film. I only kissed Bharath on his forehead and not on his lips.”
Meena to continue acting after marriage
Actress Meena will soon be wedding Vidyasagar, a Bangalore based software engineer. The marriage ceremony will take place in Tirupathi on July 12th. A grand reception will be held at Mayor Ramanathan Hall in Chennai on July 14th.
Meena is well-known for her beautiful eyes and impressive performances in Veera, Avvai Shanmugi and Shock. She is the recipient of several awards, including the state government awards from Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. She has starred in almost 175 films and has worked in all the four South Indian languages.

South Indian Actress Meena
According to sources close to her, Meena will continue acting in films and television serials, even after her marriage as she has got the go-ahead from her fiance. She now has a couple of films to complete in Malayalam and Telugu. She is also open to films in Tamil which offer her substantial scope to exhibit her acting talent.
Senin, 15 Juni 2009
What if Nayan marries Prabhu Deva?
The media persons had a hectic day recently when reports started to flow in that Nayanthara and Prabhu Deva had exchanged the marriage vows. There were also reports that the already married Prabhu Deva faced stiff opposition from his family, who took the issue to a well-established hero for an amicable settlement. While all these flurry of activities were being reported, a bolt out of the blue came in the form a morphed photograph that showed Nayan and Prabhu Deva as man and wife. The fact that it was published by a reputed magazine created a lot of hype. To make matters worse both Nayan and Prabhu Deva were not available for comments. |
Of course, fans would be keen to know every little personal detail of their stars and marriage is a big issue that every one would want to know. But in the quest to be the first in the media to serve the hot news, some unscrupulous media houses do resort to unfair practices like publishing morphed photos. Such practices are generally followed by film-based magazines whose very existence depends on film buffs. But is it pardonable if it is done be a reputed magazine? Everyone has to realize that even movie stars have a personal life; their self-esteem and privacy ought to be respected. Of course, good press covering genuine news about our favorite stars is always a delight. Like the recent marriage of Jeyam Ravi, or the Suriya-Jyothika marriage in 2006 which was perhaps one of the best covered star events in the last decade.
It does not matter if Nayan and Prabhu marry or not. If they do, it would definitely make big news in the film industry and when such announcement comes from reliable sources, media houses can publish a cover story, discuss about the legality of the marriage etc. Why do media houses publish news based on their imagination, why do they have to jump the gun? Even after 75 years of Tamil cinema, the most sought after news items are personal tidbits of stars. This shows that we have not progressed much in terms of being able to appreciate films as works of art and technology. A movie has scores of aspects to it but the media tends to start and stop with stars and music. Rarely do camera, editing, re-recording, art direction, special effects and the like get mentioned. The depths of cinema have not been brought to the people by the media, its only the surface that has been prodded. Objective and detailed coverage of all aspects of cinema will help people understand the medium better. At present, a sort of mystic air surrounds cinema, disconnecting it from the common man as something that is only a domain for stars. Only the media can demystify cinema and bring it to the people as it is. Only then will our appreciation of the medium rise above the superficial.
Considered to be the fourth estate of the democracy, why do media houses still depend on pointless gossips in the cine industry more often than not? The reasons are very obvious. At the end of the day, it is the circulation that matters and professional ethics are guillotined to give way to sensationalism. Hoping for better press!